Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: peter michaelson who wrote (88644)	12/7/2004 7:52:19 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) of 122087

The implication to me here is that since Royer never took issue at never receiving the money that he likely wasn't expecting it in the first place. In other words, it sounds like more of a shakedown by Cleveland-- no more than a scheme to get easy money from Terrell. Here is the relevant passage: Terrell... said he wired $2,000 to Cleveland in November 2001 and said that his understanding was that the money would be used to keep FBI agent Royer happy. Cleveland testified in court that he solicited money from Terrell but that he never shared it with Royer. - Jeff

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next