SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : NNBM - SI Branch

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: stockman_scott who wrote (38230)12/8/2004 1:16:18 PM
From: abuelita  Read Replies (2) of 104197
 
scott-

canada's record is just as dismal:

theglobeandmail.com

Canada losing pollution fight, report shows

From 1995 to 2002, toxic emissions pumped into air, water and land rose by 50 per cent

By ALANNA MITCHELL
Wednesday, December 8, 2004 - Page A7

Canada's battle against toxic pollution has stalled so badly that the recorded chemical load being dumped into water, land and air has jumped by half since 1995.

The figures, which compare only the same chemicals from year to year and from 1995 to 2002, come from government-run and privately owned industries that are required by law to report them to the federal government's National Pollutant Release Inventory.

"The federal government's efforts to clean up pollution are failing," said Richard Smith, executive director of Environmental Defence, one of two non-governmental organizations that examined the data and wrote a report on them to be released today at pollutionwatch.org.

When every reportable chemical is added up, including a new batch published for the first time in this report, more than four billion kilograms of toxic material were released from industrial facilities in 2002. Ninety-two per cent of those went straight into the air.

Paul Muldoon, executive director of the second group, Canadian Environmental Law Association, said the trend runs against 1999 federal legislation, which commits the government to preventing pollution.

Environment Minister Stéphane Dion was unable to comment on the report's findings yesterday because he got an advance copy of it late in the day.

Mr. Muldoon said he is surprised by the extent of the problem because he had heard federal officials and industry captains congratulate themselves so often on having taken on the chemicals and won.

"There's this rhetoric that this problem has been resolved, but the data don't support that," Mr. Muldoon said, adding that while some of the biggest companies have taken great strides to cut toxic pollution, Canada as a whole has not kept pace with other industrial countries in this effort.

He pointed to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development environmental performance review of Canada released this fall that slammed Canada for doing less than other industrialized countries to combat traditional air pollutants. Many parts of Canada have unacceptable air quality, the review said.

On the positive side, today's report shows that a smaller load of chemicals linked to cancer is being released into the air (down 39 per cent between 1995 and 2002) and into water (down 9 per cent over the same span). But more than seven million kilograms of the cancer-related substances were released into the air in 2002, along with another 176,000 kg into water.

Mr. Muldoon called this finding "repugnant," and noted that economical ways to prevent these chemicals from entering the air, land and water are in common use in other industrialized countries.

The report lists the 10 facilities that sent the most carcinogens into the air.

First on the list is the Toronto facility of Vitafoam Products Canada Ltd., which put out 265,340 kg of the chemicals in 2002. The company could not be reached for comment.

Second is Inco Ltd.'s smelter complex in Copper Cliff, Ont., near Sudbury, which put out 226,907 kg.

Inco spokesman Steve Mitchell said that since 2002, the company has invested several million dollars into cutting emissions of metals at that plant, which make up the main chemical group of concern. By 2008, the company will have reduced these by half at the Copper Cliff plant compared with the 2002 levels, Mr. Mitchell said.

The third facility on the list is the Miramichi plant owned by Weyerhaeuser Canada Ltd. in New Brunswick, which emitted 199,553 kg in 2002.

Company spokesman Larry Lemon said the data as a whole are difficult to interpret. That's because different facilities are included in different years and production at each varies. He also said that, in New Brunswick, the measurements of toxic chemicals are taken out of the stack rather than on the ground as they are in Ontario.

Mr. Muldoon pointed to new figures in this report cataloguing chemicals that interact to create smog and acid rain. These have been associated with respiratory problems such as asthma, bronchitis and emphysema.

They were not reported until 2002, and have just been released along with the other numbers from 2002 for this report. They show that a total of 3.7 billion kg of toxic substances that have an impact on the respiratory system were emitted into the air that year from industry alone. That doesn't include those emitted outside the country that make their way into Canada's air.

Canada's National Pollutant Release Inventory came about as a response to the Bhopal industrial disaster 20 years ago this week when a leaked chemical cocktail killed about 18,000 people. It harmed half a million and has left a legacy of toxic chemicals that critics say are leaching into the groundwater to this day.

Tallying airborne chemicals

Top 10 facilities releasing carcinogens into the air in Canada in 2002. Quantities of carcinogens in kilograms, as reported to the National Pollutant Release Inventory.

Company name Facility name Location Amount in 2002
1. Vitafoam Products Canada Ltd. Toronto facility Toronto 265,340
2. Inco Limited Copper Cliff smelter complex Copper Cliff, Ont. 226,907
3. Weyerhaeuser Canada Limited Miramichi oriented strand-board Miramichi, N.B. 199,553
4. Stelco Inc. Stelco Hamilton Hamilton 194,027
5. Sandvik Materials Technology Tube production unit Arnprior, Ont. 185,186
6. Domfoam International Inc. Domfoam Montreal 178,427
7. Noranda Inc. Fonderie Home Rouyn-Noranda, Que. 167,310
8. Inco Limited Thompson operations Thompson, Man. 165,710
9. Hudson Bay Mining and Smelting Company Ltd. Metallurgical complex Flin Flon, Man. 154,934
10. Ainsworth Lumber Co. Ltd. Grande Prairie oriented stand-board mill Grande Prairie, Alta. 132,050
Total top 10 1,869,444
Total Canada 7,007,091

SOURCE: pollutionwatch.org
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext