SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (90851)12/8/2004 4:52:19 PM
From: J. C. Dithers  Read Replies (3) of 108807
 
but you can't think much of those folks who still think Iraq was involved in 9/11, and that Saddam was active with Al Qaeda. Whoever those people voted for, they are idiots.

Do you know what question "those [stupid] folks" were asked? (Let alone under what circumstances?).

Were they asked question "Do you think Iraq was involved in 9/11 and that Saddam was active with Al Qaeda?"

I hope not, but it wouldn't be the first time pollsters used a compound question looking for a "yes" or "no".

Was the word "involved" used in the question(s) asked?

You, who prizes nuances so much, should be asking just what the hell does "involved" mean?

Are you "involved" if you knew about 9/11 in advance? If you heard about it through the grapevine are you "involved"?

If you had any connection whatsoever to the training or funding of terrorists were you "involved" in 9/11?

And were people asked "Was Saddam active with Al Queda"?

Just what the hell does "active" .... Oh, never mind.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext