Elgindy asserts he is not asssociated to Khashoggi. Elgindy claims he hates Adnan Khashoggi. Keep in mind that as a short-seller of securities, it was Tony's business to "hate" a lot of people and a lot of "businesses" to drive down their share prices for his benefit, and the benefit of his ring traders and associates. HATING for the "EYEBALLS".
Elgindy is presently being tried in Federal Court in Brooklyn on charges of racketeering, assisted in his rackets by two FBI agents. "The New York Times" captured the essence of information provided by witnesses at the trial -- linking Tony Elgindy (knowingly or unknowingly) to Al Qaeda. In the November 9, 2004 article (below), you will notice that prior to the 9/11 attack, Tony wired $6 million to Mercy International, a "relief" organization, not unlike those IRID "focused" on to "resuscitate its business" circa 1999. (http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,20331,00.html)
Cantor Fitzgerald filed a complaint in September, 2004. It was joined by the Port Authority of New York - New Jersey. In the Complaint you will see that Mercy International Relief Agency aka Mercy International is based in Saudi Arabia, with offices overseas, including an office in Tony Elgindy's favorite trading city, Vancouver, B.C. Mercy International is named a defendant in this action.
Note the charity Mercy International is overseen by Prince Salman, King Fahd's brother and the wealthy and powerful Governor of Riyadh. Funds collected by Mercy International were conduited by Prince Salman directly to Al Qaeda, hence Prince Salman is also named a defendant in the litigation.
Curiously, Prince Salman has two sons who died suddenly ... Fahd (Fahad) bin Salman and Ahmed bin Salman. Ahmed bin Salman died July 22, 2002, not long after he was revealed to the CIA as having foreknowledge of the attack and being a contact and protector of Abu Zubaydah. What is important to know is that two other young princes who were cousins of Brothers Fahd and Ahmed died within days of Ahmed bin Salman.
Then came a book, "Why America Slept", by Posner. Posner reported on a CIA Intelligence Report of the disclosures of Al Qaeda detainee Abu Zubyadah in the late spring of 2002 -- Zubaydah provided the names of four Saudis with foreknowledge of the attack who were associated with Zubaydah -- three of them are the dead princes. Circa 2002, the CIA knew they had all been implicated by Zubaydah. Posner's book, "Why America Slept" was released in September 2003. This book provides the first public information about Abu Zubaydah's revelations of Saudis with foreknowledge, naming the same three subsequently deceased Saudi princes. Immediatey, those with mentalities like the bashers obsesing on Pugs here, were saying Zubaydah was "made up" as a distraction -- but he wasn't. He had a long history and was wanted for murder.
If you followed the hearings of the 9/11 National Commission in April, 2004, Condi Rice disclosed the title of the August 6, 2001 President's Daily Brief (which can be obtained online), forcing release of the document. Who got two mentions as a top Al Qaeda planner? Abu Zubaydah ... listed as responsible for coordinating attacks within the U.S. Yet - look at the footnotes to the 9/11 Report -- look up Zubaydah. You will see that the CIA Intelligence Reports for the period April - July 2002 were not provided to the Commission; or in the alternative, they were not disclosed by the Commission. Only reports for August 2002 through April 2004 Zubaydah interviews were provided.
Activist Carol Broillet credits her interest in activism in part to the powerful book by Richard Labeviere, "Dollars for Terror." In particular, Carol has said she was impressed by Chapter 7 of the book, which mentions the CIA's involvement financing the Muslim Brothers, and the Swiss bank network and fronts. (Anyone bashers here ever paid for services by a guy who bought the Swiss Banking Network of an infamous CIA money laundering ops? Word is that Timothy Miles worked for him too. As did Art Murray) But any mention of Muslim Brothers involvement with the CIA on various 9-11 research networks resulted in teams of Ruppert-ites coming forward to insult, harass, or threaten posters. Other Ruppert comments were that the posters themselves were "crazy", or were "psycho-terrorists". In short, Mike Ruppert exercises the very same tactics used by Tony Elgindy on Ruppert himself. Ironic? -- or is it? Some of the charges for which Elgindy is being tried involve delivering threats.
"...you as well as I were continuously bought in and we continuously reshorted it."
No one understands these highly evolved Market mechanics but the WebFraud3, huh? OK, sure. LMFAO! You don't get "rigged market"? You don't get "stock promotion"? You don't get - more donations to Blessed Relief with the money? What coincidences -Nassar, El-Bawtri, Khashoggi, bin Laden and Tony Elgindy (all Arabs) - Elgindy, a guy who proclaimed he was an agent of a KLA run "relief" organization, MTHO. A guy whose father formed a web of relief orgs on behalf of financing Hamas terrorist Mohammed Salah. A guy whose brother was an associate of Sami Al-Arian's and activetly petitioned to unfreeze the assets of the Holy Land Foundation with Al-Arians "web" of orgs, the MPAC, CAIR & AMC. Some stretch of the imagination to suggest that Elgindy's criminal racketeering ring, so tied to terrorist financing AND STOCK MANIPULATION, might MANIPULATE these Arab's tightly held markets to FINANCE TERRORISM, huh?
-----------------
Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
The New York Times
November 9, 2004 Tuesday
Late Edition - Final
SECTION: Section C; Column 5; Business/Financial Desk; Pg. 14
LENGTH: 517 words
HEADLINE: Judge in Stock Adviser's Trial Bars Testimony on Terrorism
BYLINE: By ERIC DASH
BODY:
For five days, jurors have seen dozens of e-mail messages, a litany of Internet chat room logs and countless company reports as federal prosecutors presented their conspiracy case against Anthony Elgindy, the San Diego stock adviser accused of obtaining illegal information from an F.B.I agent to manipulate the stock market.
But they will not hear evidence supporting an assertion that prosecutors once made suggesting that Mr. Elgindy might have had advance knowledge of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, a judge said yesterday.
The matter came up in the fourth full day of testimony in United States District Court in Brooklyn. Derrick Cleveland, a former business associate of Mr. Elgindy who is now a government witness, was asked by an assistant United States attorney, Kenneth Breen, about a mid-September 2001 F.B.I. investigation into Mr. Elgindy. When Mr. Cleveland responded that the investigation was related to ''terrorism,'' Judge Raymond J. Dearie brought the hearing to a halt.
''This case has nothing to do with terrorism,'' he said to the jury in a planned set of instructions. ''You will hear no evidence that Mr. Elgindy or others were involved in 9/11.''
Mr. Cleveland was allowed to continue with his testimony, recounting how he learned that Mr. Elgindy was a subject in a criminal investigation. Mr. Cleveland said that Jeffrey A. Royer, an F.B.I. agent who was the source of that information and a defendant in the case, told him that investigators were looking into $6 million that Mr. Elgindy had liquidated from two brokerage companies, Charles Schwab and Salomon Smith Barney, shortly before Sept. 11.
Mr. Royer also relayed information that the government was examining the money Mr. Elgindy gave to Mercy International, which Mr. Breen described as a ''Middle Eastern charity.''
Mr. Royer promised to ''keep an eye'' on the case, Mr. Cleveland testified, ''and as new things came out, he would let me know.''
The judge's comments emerged from a 25-minute discussion early yesterday between the prosecutors and the lawyers for the defendants before the trial resumed, and sought to resolve months of legal wrangling.
In public reports and in court, Mr. Elgindy's lawyers have argued that there is no basis for suggesting that their client had ties to terrorism.
But in May 2002, Mr. Breen argued in a bail hearing that the decision of Mr. Elgindy to sell $300,000 in stock on the afternoon of Sept. 10 might suggest that he had ''preknowledge of Sept. 11 and rather than report it he attempted to profit from it.''
An F.B.I. spokesman said yesterday that ''no evidence was found about any individual'' to support that assertion. The judge's comments come a week into a trial on securities fraud. Mr. Elgindy is accused of having published negative information on several Internet chat rooms about small-capitalization companies to drive down their stock price. The information had been obtained by Mr. Royer from confidential government databases.
Mr. Elgindy also faces extortion and obstruction of justice charges related to the stock-selling arrangement.
URL: nytimes.com; |
