SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (90880)12/9/2004 9:08:05 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) of 108807
 
I would like to point out once again that the article you posted referred to the idea that Saddam and AQ might have cooperated as having a "commensense logic". The article was correct.

Maybe it's time you accepted that sometimes an absence of evidence, means you need to go down a different pathway, to find a theory that actually does have some evidence associated with it.

If there is any evidence that Saddam and AQ did NOT cooperate, you would produce it. There is in fact an absence of evidence in both directions.

if one actually knew something about Al Qaeda and Saddam, one would think it less common sensical that they would link up, Ah, you're trying to argue Saddam was a secularist and AQ fundamentalist Muslim so they could never cooperate. Utter nonsense. We all know that a common enemy is a powerful unifier - note that the US was allied with Stalin, Mao and Ho Chi Minh during WWII. History offers plenty of other examples including in the religious realm.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News