SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bridge Player who wrote (89979)12/9/2004 9:28:25 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) of 793857
 
but if a group of Christians want to participate, then they are "trying to hijack a secular party"?

Do you think it should be against the law for private parties to stage events on public turf even with a permit?

Do you think that the organizers of the event should be required to put all comers on the agenda rather than determine their own agendas?

If you don't think the law should be changed, on what grounds would you stop organizers from determining the parameters of their own parties?

If you wouldn't stop organizers from determining the parameters of their own parties, what would you call people who insist that the organizers accept them despite thier not conforming with those parameters? If you don't like "hijackers," how about "party crashers"? Or maybe just "spoil sports?"
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News