SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mary Cluney who wrote (90060)12/10/2004 10:00:02 AM
From: aladin  Read Replies (1) of 793917
 
Mary,

There are millions of potentially violent Christians just as there potentially violent any types of people.

You missed my point entirely, I was in no way defending Christian violence. What I was attacking is the suggestion of moral equivalence between fundamentalists of various types.

Lots of people, let alone fundamentalists are potentially violent. A very few Budhists and some Christians have behaved violently over the past 30 years, but lots of Muslims have.

The PC crowd takes to calling Islam peaceful and refer to its being hijacked by a few extremists, but sometimes admit to 'few' being as much as 15%. We have Arab countries where opinion polls place killing children (if their Israeli) as an acceptable practice.

This discussion had a lot of equivalencies being made about fundamentalism in general. My point is moral equivalency misses a teeny, tiny issue called scale.

What do I mean by scale? - the level of violence from modern christian fundamentalists is less than the population as a whole and can be attributed to issues of sanity. Christian fundamentalists who happen to be insane do not really reflect an underlying problem.

Islam has a huge, gaping underlying problem and no one wants to admit its there...

John
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext