Evolution is not a random process, it is a chaotic process - these are very different beasts. If the facts don't support a particular conjecture, is it possible the conjecture is wrong, or at least incomplete? Literal (biblical) Creation is a conjecture based upon documents written and maintained by people and not supported by the evidence, namely that planets evolve, stars evolve, all over a length of time much longer than in the King James bible.
Evolution is simply a process of successive discovery performed by humans that is subject to revision and modification - it is without dogma, though some facts are well established. Even then, if a fossil appears that doesn't fit, it isn't discarded by the scientific community - the opposite occurs! It is embraced. As a human philosophy, it is a living thing. Biblical Creationism, OTOH, is dead, unless one modifies it to include continuous creation and then, that is simply a description of EVOLUTION. However, in the Bible, one is not allowed to modify any part of the document lest they commit heresy.
If a philosophy is true, it should survive any factual inquiry. |
