SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Doug Meetmer who wrote (3652)8/30/1997 12:20:00 AM
From: Eric Tai   of 20681
 
Doug,
I shared some of your questions, especially the missing of
BD anywhere in the news release is quite puzzling.

I read it a few times, it said
that the line of custody Ledoux samples (0.21 and 0.25 opt au equivalent figures) just use the stage 1 method.
They are shipping equipments to Ledoux to do the other
two stages later using all line of custody samples. No mention of fire assay for stage 1 result.

For non-line of custody samples using stage 1 and 2 method, they get the 0.734 opt au equivalent. Again no mention of fire assay.
Seemed to be similar sample but at greater depth.

For non-line of custody surface bulk samples using stage 1, 2 and 3 method, they get over 3 opt au equivalent figures.
They used standard fire assay for the method with all 3 stages involved.

Seems that they get better results with more stages
but result not conclusive since the samples are all different in all 3 cases.

And since the last two are only non-line-of-custody samples,
should ignore those non-line-of-custody results until Ledoux came up
with line of custody samples using stage 1,2,3 methods and standard fire assay results.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext