Dale
SI's TOU have changed with the wind or whatever certain SI insiders are trading short. SNRS in Jan 2000.
When the time comes, Bob can pull out whatever version fits.
My 4 year old infraction free Jon Scott was terminated without warning, scores of posts deleted and altered by SI's in house Perl script writer, while convicted felon and fraud AP was able to flat out call me a criminal that will be jailed with zero recourse from SI.
Message 12354895
Message 12354916
Message 12354943
To:Jon Scott who wrote (2430)
From: Jon Scott Tuesday, Dec 21, 1999 10:48 PM
Respond to of 4080
War eine Untertreibung Rose 125% an 1 Tag zum Fortfahren Auswahl, Sie zu erhalten muß email zu Jon@ScottOnStocks.com für INFO selbstverständlich unterzeichnen GROSS, gab ich einen anderen Sieger oder zwei oder drei heute ---- bekannt: Jon Scott (2379) Von: Jon Scott Montag, Dez 20 1999 10:01AM UND Antwort # von 2429
KAUFEN Sie UTDLW-@ 38 den letzten GROSSEN bekanntgegebenen Sieger Istzeit auf diesem Gewinde
To:Jon Scott who wrote (2429)
From: Jon Scott Tuesday, Dec 21, 1999 10:46 PM
Respond to of 4080
Jon Scott (2402) De: Jon Scott martes, DEC 21 1999 7:22PM ET contestación # de 2432
MÁS LLAMADAS de ON-THE-PARA UVEW comparan los postes a la carta 18% en 45 minutos quote.yahoo.com TODAS LAS intenciones de suscribir deben ser emailed y el rec'd de viernes para ser procesado para los pagos de Y2K. All debe estar en el email de los dólares de los E.E.U.U. a Jon@ScottOnStocks.com: Jon Scott (2400) De: Jon Scott martes, DEC 21 1999 10:59AM ET contestación # de 2428
UVEW un ganador otra vez! Rematado fuera @ de 5 7/16 y de mirar para más corrija: Tomaría los beneficios para ahora 5 1/4 hechos una oferta --- a: Jon Scott (2399) De: Jon Scott martes, DEC 21 1999 10:44AM ET contestación # de 2428
todavía uvew una compra @ 5 1/8-3/16 --- a: Jon Scott (2396) De: Jon Scott martes, DEC 21 1999 10:15AM ET contestación # de 2428
UVEW una compra @ 4 5/8 corrigen otra vez el VUELO! Los suscriptores habrían estado en @ 4 3/16
To:Jon Scott who wrote (2428)
From: Jon Scott Tuesday, Dec 21, 1999 10:51 PM
View Replies (2) | Respond to of 4080
Jon Scott (2427) De: Jon Scott mardi, DEC 21 1999 5:39PM ET réponse # de 2434
N'importe qui qui veut continuer de recevoir mes sélections en temps réel après que Y2K DOIVE souscrire. Cet amorçage a offert 1 an d'une période " d'essai " libre et fournira maintenant une mise à jour occasionnelle. Recherchez une information plus complète à scottonstocks.com par l'intermédiaire de le moment où disponible toutes les demandes d'abonnement et des accords DOIVENT être retournés le courrier électronique et/ou l'escargot-courrier par CE VENDREDI. Pour souscrire Jon@ScottOnStocks.com
These are some posts that were altered on my thread. They have since been returned to original form, but had remained there for many months. They've been archived in my Outlook drafts folder in their HTML form
Note the content is obviously not what belongs there
SI: StockTalk: Short-Term Traders : Can you beat 50% per month?
Previous | Next | Respond View Replies (1) | View Next 10 Messages
To: Ernest K Brandt who wrote (3091)
From: slave Friday, May 5, 2000 8:33 AM ET
Reply # of 3301
I'm kind of anxious to see who does get excluded.. HO HO HO
Previous | Next | Respond View Replies (1) | View Next 10 Messages
Previous | Next | Respond View Replies (1) | View Next 10 Messages
To: T. Peirce Baker who wrote (3085)
From: Ernest K Brandt Thursday, May 4, 2000 10:07 PM ET
Reply # of 3301
Rick, any comments on the year-end report? It's seems that Magellan may be a little desperate if they have to issue three news releases that are average...at least to me.
Is MAL's debt level too high?
I do like the fact that Bristol's doing more space work, can Magellan translate that into NASA work in the U.S.? That would be good....
Previous | Next | Respond View Replies (1) | View Next 10 Messages
Remove SubjectMark Ignore this Person View SubjectMarks
Terms of Use
StockTalk | Hot Subjects | New Subjects | StockTalk Search
SI: StockTalk: Short-Term Traders : Can you beat 50% per month?
2 Replies to Post 3085
To: T. Peirce Baker who wrote (3085)
From: Anthony@Pacific May 4, 2000 3:08 PM
Respond to Post # 3086 of 4
I have a private service..but his claims were ilegal..you wont catch me making claims like he does..evn though I believ my track record is untouchable by him..iuts really simple..its a vilotion to pump your own site...on SI..
I have no motive since it wasnt I who turned himn in
To: T. Peirce Baker who wrote (3085)
From: Ernest K Brandt May 4, 2000 10:07 PM
Respond to Post # 3091 of 1
Rick, any comments on the year-end report? It's seems that Magellan may be a little desperate if they have to issue three news releases that are average...at least to me.
Is MAL's debt level too high?
I do like the fact that Bristol's doing more space work, can Magellan translate that into NASA work in the U.S.? That would be good....
Remove SubjectMark View SubjectMarks
To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (3076)
From: James Reiher Thursday, May 4, 2000 9:14 PM ET
Reply # of 3301
Bambs -- you might be interested to learn that the 40%
you're referring to is IN ADDITION TO, and NOT PART OF,
Cisco's earnings. (Sorry for the shouting, folks, but this
guy seems to need it.)
Don't believe me? Check the sources. Here's Cisco's Statement of Operations filed September 28, 1999:
edgar-online.com.
And here's the Statement of Cash Flows from that report:
edgar-online.com.
You'll see that, in the Cash Flow Report, the $837M in Tax
benefits from employee stock plans is ADDED to the net
income to report total cash flows. It's NOT counted in
earnings.
I'm going back to lurking now. I hope you do too.
To: James Reiher who wrote (3089)
From: Anthony@Pacific Thursday, May 4, 2000 9:23 PM ET
Reply # of 3301
LOL!! - That was Beautiful...
To: slave who wrote (3092)
From: T. Peirce Baker Friday, May 5, 2000 9:11 AM ET
Reply # of 3301
Well, Major, I am here. As I believe I have explained to the board some time ago, I will only repeat factual information that is in the public domain. This is your forum, not mine.
I am available by email, jkrueger@alpineoil.com, or toll-free at 877-474-4544.
Regards,
Jason Krueger
To: T. Peirce Baker who wrote (3093)
From: Ernest K Brandt Friday, May 5, 2000 10:36 AM ET
Reply # of 3301
Those are good points lazarre. Momentum has died off, and I agree fundamentals are as important as ever. And if they will matter, AHAA should do fine. In fact, I am keeping AHAA in my portfolio as an indicator of the market. If AHAA goes down, it means fundamentals and earnings growth doesn't matter, which translates into a declining market. If AHAA holds up or moves higher, the market may be alright. Not very scientific, but it is really as good as anything in this difficult to define market environment.
Tom
To: Ernest K Brandt who wrote (3094)
From: T. Peirce Baker Friday, May 5, 2000 10:59 AM ET
Reply # of 3301
Why did you dump your XLA?
clearstation.com
To: T. Peirce Baker who wrote (3095)
From: mynoell Friday, May 5, 2000 11:45 AM ET
Reply # of 3301
Re: Moderated Discussion
I appreciate you bringing that to my attention, Greg, but I won't be making any such application. I'm not wise enough to assume "god like" powers over others. Besides, a number of valued contributors began their association with G&K in a confrontational manner, and I might have hit the <kill switch> prematurely. I'd rather rely on group dynamics and SI's terms of use to weed out those whose sole purpose is to disrupt polite and productive discourse.
The threat of Oracle and Siebel competing has come up many times, and the fm cautions that the result of Gorilla wars are unpredictable. I'm watching it closely, as I did the csco/lu faceoff, and am monitoring comments from experts in both camps. Thus far, it appears to be more of a war of words than substance, but it has the potential to impact our investments. Since we have many more sebl than orcl investors on G&K, I'd appreciate any insights you can offer.
uf
To: mynoell who wrote (3096)
From: T. Peirce Baker Friday, May 5, 2000 12:50 PM ET
Reply # of 3301
I'm in finally. <EOM>
We will see if someone starts to like this stock again.
Joe P.
To: H G Eichorst who wrote (3098)
From: T. Peirce Baker Friday, May 5, 2000 1:09 PM ET
Reply # of 3301
marketgems.com Technically it just bounced off support
at about 117 1/2 the next resistance or target
could be 140-142.. If it passes that then 162 and so on assuming the market climate offers a modicum of equilibrium.
To: T. Peirce Baker who wrote (3099)
From: H G Eichorst Friday, May 5, 2000 1:12 PM ET
Reply # of 3301
sometimes allowing one is like being teased.....
just makes you want more.
guess it is all a matter of what your personality type can best manage.
3 a day is down from what???
Jane |
