SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: zonder12/15/2004 8:43:54 AM
  Read Replies (1) of 116555
 
FOMC - Fed Sends Subtle Signals Via The Text

Some analysts feared a "bearish" turn in the text of the decision which
confirmed a widely-anticipated 25bp rate rise in the Fed funds rate. Some
feared that the "moderate" pace phrase would be deleted- it WAS NOT DELETED.
Other analysts expected- even feared - that the bias statement would be
changed from "Balanced" (neutral)to "Tightening" (inflation). This DID NOT
CHANGE. So what did change compared to the previous (Nov 10) statement?
The answer is instructive. The main change was this. In the previous
statement, the text read unequivocally, "...labour market conditions HAVE
IMPROVED." By contrast, the latest statement argues that, " Labour market
conditions APPEAR to improve GRADUALLY." This is a subtle BUT SIGNIFICANT
change. This is more heavily qualified than the ultra confident earlier
remark about the labour market and reflects the reality of the labour
market. The latest nonfarm payrolls data DOES GIVE GROUNDS TO BE LESS
OPTIMISTIC ABOUT GROWTH.

Conclusion: The Fed is committed to a FLEXIBLE gradualism in its approach
to raising rates. The data from the US economy has NOT been unequivocally
strong and rates are now moving closer to (but still not at) neutrality.
The Fed can afford to await the data flow until the next FOMC on Feb 2nd.
If the data continues to be mixed, there will be pauses ahead in the
tightening process. As the Fed has indicated, the neutral real rate is
lower than historical precedent would suggest
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext