Ray > LPS5 is merely being obstinately argumentative and protective of the dominant myths of American elites
He is, and without any doubt, but one doesn't know his agenda. Maybe he doesn't even know it himself?!
> On the other hand, I completely disagree that we are merely offering subjective evaluations here.
It all depends on what one calls objective evidence. Opinions, even strong ones, expert ones, are not evidence. Hypotheses are not evidence. Statistical improbability, or probability, is not evidence. Evidence would be a confession, under oath, of someone who was directly involved or who saw explosives being placed etc. Evidence would be the chemical analysis of the steel from the core of the WTC which showed that explosives were used. And so on. You know what I'm talking about and you also know Hell will have to freeze before any of that is possible.
And, meanwhile, LPS5 can have fun goading and taunting us which, frankly, I don't mind because it keeps me on my toes. |
