SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Grainne who wrote (91381)12/15/2004 4:31:32 PM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (1) of 108807
 
I'm afraid the broad brush bearers were confusing you with me. I'd said that he was CIA trained and documented it in this unanswered sprig of posting...
starting
Message 20852921
and ending
Message 20856238

We haven't heard whether a CIA guy training a third party to train an operative while the CIA is providing funding for such actions is "CIA-trained" or not. It is a very fine line - the kind that lawyers make pay, or not. But my example stands. In U.S. regulated industry if a company trains my supervisor, and he trains a contractor, and the contractor trains me and this is all paid for by the company, then the company has established that they trained me, irrespective of how such training was administered.

If there was another example where bin Laden had trained the ACLU to undermine the war effort through a bin Laden funded intermediary, an opposite argument would be made by jla. But not by me. Mine would be the same and I'd condemn such funding as well.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News