Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 166.95

-4.1%

3:55 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (3809)	8/30/1997 2:02:00 PM
From: Richard Belanger	of 152472

Maurice - Appreciate your posts. Regarding health effects, just about anything can happen at cellular and molecular level, but consensus of scientific community is that there is no "substantial" evidence that RF can cause or contribute to cancer. As opposed to ionizing radiation, the mechanisms for RF damage are more deterministic than stochastic. The best site I have seen for a scientific treatment of health effects from cell phones, PCS and base stations (in FAQ format) is at: mcw.edu It is by Professor John Moulder of the Medical College of Wisconsin, an acknowledged expert on non-ionizing radiation effects. He also presents contrary findings, an extensive bibliography, and lots of neat diagrams. I am in the worry-more-about-keeping-your-eyes-on-the-road camp. Rich

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next