Joe,
History does have a way of revealing the truth in matters. Particularly on message boards where history is captured. The accuracy of my research has been questioned by many here lately, so I thought perhaps it was time to assemble a "reality check". Time for you to make the call.
Pluvia vs Westergaard came about as a result of my posts about PLSIA and Westergaard's subsequent accusations against me, regarding the content of these posts and my motive. My posts are at the heart of the issue, so lets see what I said, and evaluate for accuracy, slant and hype. Then, for fun, lets compare my research with Jesse Eisinger's research in his article at THEStreet.com.
Here are a group of my PLSIA research posts.
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
Now, here is Jesse Esinger's article from THEStreet.com
thestreet.com
Now, here is a link with Westergaard's accusations and my responses.
techstocks.com
Also, many here have commented that I have a harsh rude style on the PLSIA & other boards. True, but I suggest you put this all in perspective. For the research I did on PLSIA, TLTK and others, I was flamed and attacked relentlessly. I do often post harsh responses to persons that present factually void arguments and baseless hype. I have no apologizes for this. Furthermore, if you look at the attacks made on me for presenting what IMO is quality research, I think in retrospect my responses were rather reserved.
Beyond my PLSIA posts, the issue remains -- do we have the right to express our opinion and bearish research without being harassed with Westergaard tactics?
Cheers Steve |
