Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (213500)	12/17/2004 6:04:01 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (4) of 1576357

Huh? You're mixing everything up. You yourself said its up to the courts to interpret the laws. That's not what Bush did at Guantanamo. He violated a treaty to which the US is a party. The US is a signatory on the Geneva Conventions. We are supposed to follow the provisions of the Conventions in a time of war. Bush did not follow those provisions at Guantanamo. The Geneva conventions do not apply to illegal combatants. The treaties were not violated. What army were they members of? Can you show an image of the uniform they were wearing? Please inform those of us that stick to the facts where their military records are stored? Maybe you could be provide a huge service to the world by telling us what nation pays their wages. His wife is a CIA operative. It is against the law to disclose her identity. The consensus seems to be that when he / she crossed the line into playing politics and lying, they waived her rights to protection. It also appears to be a stretch to say that she was covert. Complain about something with meat.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next