SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Oeconomicus who wrote (154404)12/19/2004 11:07:19 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
1,The genetics vs. choice argument has no legal relevance

I didn't bring up that argument, and two- it has relevance in terms of what people think. Statistically people are a lot more likely to want to discriminate against homosexuals if they view the orientation as a choice.

2.The "right" to marry is created by society. I simply think that any right created should be open to as many people as possible, and I see no valid reason for limiting that right in the case of same sex couples, since I don't find "comfort" for people who want to discriminate, or the tradition of discriminating, a valid reason for state and federal laws.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News