SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (91382)12/19/2004 3:27:02 PM
From: haqihana  Read Replies (1) of 793759
 
kholt, The amendment is very clear on the subject of religion, and is constantly being misinterpreted. Paraphrased, all it says is, that there will be no government forced religion. At the time, that was needed to prevent such things as the mandated Anglican church in Britain, and the Catholic domination of nations such as Spain, and Italy. They don't say that religion should not be allowed in the nation. They don't say that a group of people of the same religion do not have the right to form a political bloc, and decide how they want to vote. Above all, they did not say that one religion should bow to the wishes of another, or the wishes of atheists, wiccans, druids, Black Panthers, or the KKK.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext