SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread.
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Sladek who wrote (1048)12/21/2004 12:30:13 AM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (2) of 5425
 
Slaydick, you continue to show that "a little knowledge is dangerous."

It amazes me how you can know so little about so much.

I have never said that these types of things are common - in fact the references provided stress that they are rare. There is th epossibility that new precident <sic> will be set and as always, and as is their right, the jury (and not the judge) will have the ultimate say on the law.

Talk about back-pedaling. You originally posted that the jury ALWAYS can overrule the judge. ROFLMAO.

Precedent - refers to rulings of law. There was no precedent set by the OJ jury.

The jury finds facts.

You truly are an idiot. Unfortunately, you think you know something. Get your sliderule out and measure it slaydick. You'll probably leave empty handed.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News