Pluvia vs. Westergaard Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Pluvia vs. Westergaard

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (716)	8/30/1997 9:35:00 PM
From: Bill Wexler	of 1267

<<OK, but does Westergaard have the right to get a louder microphone>> Yes, absolutely. <<...warn the crowds that Pluvia is a criminal>> Yup. He's stating his opinion about Pluvia. Pluvia may then sue him for the slander. <<and urge someone to silence him?>> I don't recall Westergaard urging anyone to "silence him"...but just for the sake of argument...I believe this enters one of those fuzzy gray areas. For example, if Westergaard paid someone to hurt or harass Pluvia then he certainly would be breaking the law. I'm really not certain that "urging" someone to commit a crime is a crime in itself until money or some consideration changes hands.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next