Booms, Busts, and Recoveries Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (57418)	12/22/2004 4:38:15 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) of 74559

<George Bush has a much more straightforward solution to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration. His plan is to disregard it. That's a hell of a lot cheaper than pioneering an entirely novel technology to solve something that the energy industry is in near complete denial about.> King George II is quite right to ignore C02 emissions. They are good. My wonderful invention was a just-in-case idea, should there really be a problem. I wanted to see what it would cost to solve the possible problem and how it could be done. Another fun method is to freeze CO2 and stack it into mountains. If an ice-age threatened, the covers could be taken off and the CO2 ablated to keep us warm via a greenhouse effect. I thought having it alive in the ecosphere was a better solution - the oceanic ecosphere would boost fish, which is yummy stuff. I looked for the liquid CO2 at 20,000 leagues BOE scientific analysis I did back in 1987, but couldn't find it. But I'm pretty sure my numbers are right. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next