I should ask, Pugs, do you think it makes you look more authoritative by piling on more paragraphs in a citation than actually meet the subject material? For example, your inclusion (and self-important bolding <g>) of 4(b)-4(f) simply talk about circumstances of renewal of investigation. What, in your mind, is the relevance of that to the actual docket? For that matter, perhaps you can explain to us, your understanding in your own words, how 3(a)(i-iv) apply to the current docket? I'll give a hint: parameters of scope don't spell t-e-r-r-o-r-i-s-m on the docket.
It's obvious you can click a mouse, but it seems only your cursor, rather than your comprehension skill, is picking up anything. Why don't you explain to us what that mass quantity of verbiage actually means. I think we'd all appreciate hearing your perspective on your mastery of the topic. You did, after all, copy 'n paste it, so surely you can understand and articulate what it means, eh? |
