SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Asyst Technologies (ASYT) Good Value/Where is the Bottom?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (2256)12/24/2004 1:17:24 PM
From: Barry  Read Replies (1) of 2313
 
good riddance to 2004 and here's to a happier 2005

biz.yahoo.com

Form 8-K for ASYST TECHNOLOGIES INC /CA/
23-Dec-2004
Material Impairment, Notice of Delisting or Transfer, Non Reliance on

Item 2.06. Material Impairments.

On December 17, 2004, the company's management, in consultation with the company's Audit Committee, determined to remove from service and make available for sale certain land and building in Nagoya, Japan that relates to its wholly-owned Japanese subsidiary Asyst Japan, Inc., or AJI. As a result, the company expects to record an impairment charge in its third fiscal quarter in the range of $4 million to $5 million, based on the company's most-recent assessment of fair market value.
The building has been underutilized since a prior decision to outsource manufacturing, and has previously been partially written down.

The sale of the property is not expected, in and of itself, to result in any direct future cash expenditure (other than associated transaction costs). However, the property comprising the land and building collateralizes approximately $10 million (at the exchange rate as of December 17, 2004) of Japanese Yen-denominated debt held with a local bank. This debt is guaranteed by the company and, in conjunction with the sale of the property, will likely need to be refinanced in whole or in part.

The company estimates that the sale of the property will be effected in the next twelve months. However, until a transaction is completed, the company cannot determine the actual proceeds of any such sale, whether the Japanese Yen-denominated debt held with a local bank will, in fact, be refinanced in whole or in part and what amount, if any, of associated cash out-lay will be required by the company.

Item 3.01. Notice of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy a Continued Listing Rule or Standard; Transfer of Listing.

The company has appeared before a Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel on December 15, 2004, to discuss its filing delay relating to its Form 10-Q for the second fiscal quarter. The panel took no action and the matter remains open. The company requested a filing extension until January 14, 2005, and expects to file in advance of that date its Form 10-Q for the fiscal second quarter and, as a result of the restatement determination discussed in Item 4.02 below, a Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal first quarter.

Item 4.02. Non-Reliance on Previously Issued Financial Statements or a Related Audit Report or Completed Interim Review.

(a) On December 17, 2004, the company's management, in consultation with the Audit Committee of the company's Board of Directors, determined to restate the company's consolidated financial statements for its fiscal first quarter ended June 26, 2004, and determined that the financial information for that period included in the company's Form 10-Q previously filed on August 5, 2004, and in any press releases prior to December 20, 2004 which incorporate or reference such financial information, should not be relied upon. Management and the company's Audit Committee also discussed the matters described in this Item 4.02 with the company's independent registered public accounting firm.

The company was significantly delayed in reporting its fiscal second quarter results because Asyst Shinko, Inc. (ASI), the company's 51%-owned joint venture company in Japan, was not able to close its books in a timely manner. As previously announced, this was due to difficulties associated with ASI's conversion to a new ERP information system and to a now-resolved customer contract dispute at ASI. Closing ASI's books required substantial review and rebuilding of ASI's financial records for the fiscal second quarter. This process also identified material accounting errors in ASI's fiscal first quarter results, which has led to the decision to restate those results. As part of the restatement, the company also made adjustments to the fiscal first quarter results reported for ATI, its base business, to reflect the deferral of certain new product-related revenue that had been previously recognized in the quarter and amortization of deferred stock compensation.

The company believes that the ERP system conversion issues that led to inventory reconciliation difficulties at ASI have been addressed and that the system will support the timely preparation and submission of its consolidated financial statements in future reporting periods.

The accounting errors at ASI primarily understated ASI's cost of goods sold for the fiscal first quarter by $3.6 million. Consolidated net loss on a GAAP basis for the fiscal first quarter will be restated to $(2.3 million), or $(0.05) per share, compared with a GAAP net loss of $(0.9 million), or $(0.02) per share, as originally reported.

The company anticipates filing its Form 10-Q/A to present the restated financial information for the fiscal first quarter and Form 10-Q for the fiscal second quarter as soon as practicable.

The company has determined that the recent delay in closing ASI's books, the accounting errors that led to the restatement of fiscal first quarter results, and the improper business practices at ASI constitute material weaknesses in the company's internal control over financial reporting. The company is enhancing financial controls and procedures to strengthen timely review and analysis of operations and financial results, and plans to increase the level of staffing in critical functional areas, including cost accounting and internal audit at ASI.

The Audit Committee of the company's board of directors has concluded its independent investigation of the improper business practices at ASI that led to the recently resolved customer contract dispute. The Audit Committee has approved management's remediation plan for ASI, which is to be implemented over the next several quarters.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext