Louis,
Was your statement below 100% fact.
exchange2000.com
Why do accuse someone of doing something wrong, when you have done the exact same thing. Or should your statements hold more credibility than Pluvia's, and if so why ??
You have no more right to post bullish info on a co. than he does his bearish comments. Should the shareholders of Plsia hold you responsible for your comments, as you suggest they should Pluvia? If Plsia does not succeed with it's business plan and the stock tanks, what obligation do you have to shareholders for your comments ??
How about Westergaard, after he touts a co., that company fails to succeed, the stock tanks, how much does he pay back to those that have taken his advise and lost money.
Pluvia has the same rights you and Westergaard have !!!! Better than that, is Westergaard's own admission, that most of Pluvia's comments are correct. What attorney is necessary after Westergaards statements?
Regards and good luck to all,
Tom
PS. Lou, I'm thinking of shorting Plsia monday, what's your opinion. Maybe Westergaard will help with his recommendation on it's potential as a short. |
