SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mishedlo who wrote (19933)12/30/2004 3:00:07 PM
From: russwinter  Read Replies (1) of 116555
 
Ok, have a question for you. I think we are both in agreement that credit risk spreads are just too narrow, in la la land. What do you think are the best trades to play a widening. There's the old TED spread, buy 13 week TBs/short EDs, and I guess one could figure out some kind of long UST, short LIBOR (considered AA rated I believe?). Or if you felt like me there were two trades in motion: wider credit risk spreads, and a wider yield curve, or even a third, wider spreads for agencies versus treasuries, one could buy a UST 2 year or even a 13 week TB, and short the 5 or 10 year agency. I'm interested in the mechanics too, to ensure people are alert to the sizes, etc. : for instance 2yr TNs trade in $200k amounts, and US agency notes in 100k, so one would have to equal the amounts.

Final question, do you think USTs are really AAA rated ? I don't <ng.> Of course no credit agency would ever downgrade them. What would it take, twin deficits of 13%, 15% of GDP, for another year, two? Is there no limit to what rating agencies would ignore?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext