Bill,
In my post to you I referenced Westergaards truth squad because of his comments below.
>>>>If the consequence of that reckless act was for one or more persons to die, I say better they than some innocent bystanders. That's an insight into how JW thinks. It may not be pretty but it is honest.<<<<
I believe Mr. Westergaard is trying to blame the accident on the Princess and her boyfriend instead of the people chasing her. He makes no reference to the photographers, in this post below.
exchange2000.com
Additionally, Bill, without sending you back to a magnitude of posts, please spend some time researching claims made by both sides. In Westergaards own words, he says, " that Pluvia's claims are not without merit ". If that be the case, what is Westergaards reasoning for hunting Pluvia down with his bounty?? The answer could only be to silence him. Or is it that Westergaard doesn't like the fact that Pluvia posts anonymously ? What then ? When Westergaard finds Pluvia's identity, he publishes it for all to see, and claims Pluvia did have an agenda but his posts were true.
Isn't that what is done on SI each day by both bulls and bears, without regard to consequences. Unless of course someone is deliberately misleading with half truths, hints or outright lies.
I think Pluvia's documentation of events in Plsia have some credibility and should be researched by anyone interested enough to spend the time. Then a determination should be made, as to what Westergaards intent is with his bounty. I think you'll find the answer to Westergaard's intent is ugly.
It would also be interesting to hear from Plsia, for if Pluvia has damaged them in anyway, they should still side with Westergaard, and defend his methods. If everything is as rosy as this company has claimed, shouldn't that assumption be correct ??
Best Regards
Tom
PS. Bill, I have just read your post on A Tribute to The Princess reference below.
exchange2000.com
If you were serious regarding God and priests, kindly do not answer me and I shall do the same. That is truly insulting. |
