Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread.

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: scion who wrote (1705)	1/6/2005 3:47:21 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) of 5425

It's fascinating in many respects to argue with a pathological liar. For example, you could have a paragraph that says "John said he didn't do it. However, everyone present said he did" and the pathological liar will just quote the first sentence as proof John didn't do it. Or: "I started ACME Corp in 1995 but it burned down in 1995." The pathological liar will say "The reason why you burned it down was to cover up for someone that happened three years later." Or: "I don't believe you were able to drive your car across the ocean" to which the reply might be "You keep claiming I can't drive my car." On the one hand, the deductions are so absurd and so blatant you feel compelled to point them out. But, on the other hand, you just can't fathom anyone else could be that stupid so as to have to be shown the absurdity. - Jeff

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next