I have no doubt that you can Google your way to counter every expert opinion or study that goes against your world view of "US good. Whatever it does good. Bush good. His wars good. They don't even kill more people than peacetime." etc.
This was the way you replied to estimations and projections before the war. Whenever someone posted a general, a UN inspector, etc that said "It is not a good idea to invade Iraq" or "We don't have proof that Iraq has WMDs", there you would be, a busy bee Googling until you found someone trashing them. One was a pacificist, the other not credible, another was anti-American, etc etc.
So there you are. Supporting your misleader who wanted to invade Iraq with any sorry excuse they could come up with. Too blind in your faith to acknowledge what your eyes and ears tell you every day - Bush was WRONG in his reasons to invade Iraq, there were NO WMDs, Iraq was never a threat to the US that could possibly justify the loss of more than a thousand dead and 10,000 wounded Americans. Not to mention the thousands and thousands and thousands of dead Iraqis, who never did anything against America nor its interests, anywhere.
All you can do is bicker over the number of dead Iraqis. This study says this but hey it might not be all that correct. Gee, if it's not 100,000 but 90,000, then it's OK, I guess. Go invade more countries, kill more people.
See how many world citizens love Americans to death then... |
