WESTY TAKES CHARGE OF INTERNET - HE WILL PUT IT TO ORDER
Westy's site has just posted, between other garbage, the following statements:
<<What's really happening here is that the Internet investment forum community is at a stage in its development equivalent to Dodge City circa 1845. It is the wild west and it needs to be tamed -- not stopped in its tracks -- but tamed to become more responsible.>>
FEAR NOT, WESTY WILL TAME INTERNET, which, by BTW, was created for his personal enrichment [you know, Westy paid $2k for his pc, therefore internet is his property].
<<If people such as "Pluvia" are going to use investment forums as a means of promoting non-investment oriented interests of one company, in this instance Ion Laser Technologies (ILT), by bad mouthing the products of a competitor, Premier Laser Systems (PLSIA), members should be so advised. >>
HENCEFORTH, ONLY I, WESTY, AM ALLOWED TO USE INTERNET FOR PROMOTING INTERESTS OF COMPANIES, all others will be spammed, and worse.
<<As further indication of "Pluvia's" disingenuousness, note his posting PLSIA #911 on SI where he quotes "Tight Fiiv" as a third party source supporting his statements re PLSIA and thus by implication adding credibility to his arguments as "Pluvia." Upon discovery we find that that "Pluvia" and "Tight Fiiv" are one and the same person -- "Tight Fiiv" is a second nom de plume of Stevie Vegas!!! Hmmm..... Now, really???>>
WESTY: "truth does not matter", but "I will make the discovery".
<<SI is an investment forum. It is not a forum for certain parties to promote hidden agendae such as do "Pluvia/Tight Fiiv". Members have a right to be informed as to the intentions of posters of negative information. To make that a standard of Internet culture is Westergaard Broadcasting Network's purpose.>>
AS NOTED ABOVE, HENCEFORTH IT IS NOT ALLOWED FOR ANYBODY, BUT WESTY TO "promote hidden agendae".
<<Note that I refer to "negative information" as opposed to all information. The posting of negative information about public companies, whether true or not, carries with it a particular responsibility in that -- all other things being equal -- there is a likelihood that such postings might lead to a decrease in the value a company's shares outstanding and thereby cause a loss of value to property. >>
AS I, WESTY, AM A PAID SILL AND TOUT, IT IS PARTICULARLY FORBIDDEN TO POST TRUE [as I said, "truth does not matter"] YET NEGATIVE INFORMATION. I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO DETERMINE WHAT INFORMATION IS CONSIDERED TO BE "NEGATIVE". I ALSO RESERVE THE RIGHT TO DETERMINE THE MODE OF EXECUTION OF OFFENDERS [hanging, or electric chair are the common alternatives]
<<Is that a violation of the right to property? Hmm.... Now there's a question to be debated. I don't mean to argue that negative information shouldn't be posted but it does seem that to do so carries with it particular responsibilities as to accuracy and purity of perpose given the property rights issue.>>
ALL PERSONS FOUND TO INTERFERE WITH MY, WESTY'S, RIGHT TO RIP OFF PROPRETY FROM SUCKERS WILL BE DEALT WITH. IT IS MY RIGHT TO HAVE MY STOLEN PROPERTY UNDIMINISHED BY "the truth" AND OTHER IMMATERIAL SO CALLED FACTS.
<<Note that at an early stage of his attack Premier, "Pluvia" lied directly to the CEO by stating that he represented a group of professional short sellers. That was his cover story to put the company off the scent of his true agenda. Again an example of his disingenuosness.>>
AS I SAID BEFORE, ONLY I, I, I AM ALLOWED TO BE DISINGENIOUS
<<Westergaard Cyberpatrol has determined that "Pluvia's true agenda has been to promote the competive position of ILT. It has been determined that he does not represent professional short sellers as claimed. SI and other forum members have a right to disclosure as the intentions of hostile forum posters, particularly when those intentions are other than investment oriented. SI should take particular care not to allow its members to be manipulated by persons serving other than investment oriented agendae.>>
I, AND ONLY I, AM TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE ABOVE "manipulation disclosure" CLAUSE AS SUCH DISCLOSURE WILL UNDOUBTEDLY INTERFERE WITH MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO RIP OFF SUCKERS.
SI, TAKE NOTE OF MY MY MY RIGHTS. AND THIS IS AN ORDER!!!
$$$ don't thread on me$$$ |
