SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (6574)1/7/2005 11:26:43 AM
From: Emile Vidrine  Read Replies (1) of 22250
 
"Perhaps the original colonists had idealistic dreams of living in harmony and respect with the natives, but that surely did not last."

That's one fundamental difference. Another is the fact that most of North America was unoccupied wilderness. Native American Indians never occupied more than some 2% of the land mass in America. A third is the fact that the early Pilgrim settlers believed in an inclusive society where Indians and Europeans could be integrated within a Christian culture. The first Pilgrims were not racist in their beliefs. On the other hand, Zionists were always racist and exclusivists.

In contrast, the Zionists moved into a land that was 90% occupied by native Palestinians who had lived on and cultivated the land for some 2000 years. From the beginning the Zionist plan (read Zabotinsky and Herzl) was to expel the indigenous Palestinian people to make room for Jews.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News