SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Pluvia vs. Westergaard

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Westergaard who wrote (886)9/1/1997 4:51:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson   of 1267
 
John; I just looked into the nazi stuff, and I find it a spoof in bad taste. Of course we have free press, but only the near lowest would seek to label another the only lowest thing there is, a nazi. But you kicked back good and hard, with a full explain and link back to the rats who act like nazis under the flag of free speech.
The way I see it a non de plume is a hacker challenge to be outed as soon as possible. So you outed Pluvia, big deal. If he was a paid tout he was wrong, however who ever believes a non de plume, they have no credibility as they have no pedigree. I do not mind a stock tout, as long as he is a known commodity, and can accept his agenda and add the salt. An anonymous tout selling stock is like listening to your bootblack, when they tout stocks, sell(did not Rockefeler save his money that way, I heard in 1929?)
So when they tout short, or are they trying to make you short, so buy,
@$#?*&%& tilt. In effect you cannot pay any mind to anonymous touts, just expose them. You should have posed a hacker challenge, a free tee shirt to the pluvia outer, and then it would have not attracted the nazi stuff.
By the way did you spell my name correctly on the check?

Bill Jackson
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext