SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Don Earl who wrote (9609)1/8/2005 5:55:01 PM
From: sea_urchin  Read Replies (2) of 20039
 
Don > from a layman's point of view, the seismic data is completely consistent with a series of charges being detonated.

I think you make a good point. In fact, whether the spikes on the seismogram preceded by seconds or coincided exactly with the visible "fall" of WTC 1 and 2 hardly makes any difference to the controlled demolition argument. Indeed, each "demolition" took place completely within 30 seconds and we (maybe others have) have no idea of the precision of the time of the visible events or the synchronization between the various visible events and the seismographic data.

> The official story is it's a seismic recording of the actual collapses of the buildings, and if there's anything we've learned from 9/11, it's not to trust the official story.

It would be an incredible coincidence if the two spikes which occurred exactly at the times the two buildings "fell" arose from events other than the controlled demolition of the buildings. I might mention that the spikes do exist in the actual seismograms from PAL and have not been inserted by someone for the purpose of a conspiracy theory or whatever.

ldeo.columbia.edu

There is also a third, as yet unmentioned, spike on the above seismogram which occurred at 15H19 UTC (11H19 local) (11H15 on the serendipity.li URL). Could this be from the demolition of WTC7?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext