SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sea_urchin who wrote (9615)1/8/2005 11:28:39 PM
From: Don Earl  Read Replies (1) of 20039
 
RE: "whether the spikes on the seismogram preceded by seconds or coincided exactly with the visible "fall" of WTC 1 and 2
hardly makes any difference to the controlled demolition argument."

I think it's harder to discount the evidence of controlled demolition if it can be shown the spikes occurred well in advance of the collapses. The argument that, "The only thing that could have caused the spike is explosives.", has always looked weak to me, especially if it is assumed the spike occurred DURING the actual collapse. Not that it eliminates the possibility of explosives, I just don't see it as 100% conclusive. On the other hand, being able to show the spike preceded the beginning of the collapse by some 12 to 14 seconds, completely eliminates the possibility the spike was caused by the collapse.

RE: "Could this be from the demolition of WTC7?"

I had trouble figuring out if the graphs are on New York time or not. I thought the towers came down around an hour after they were hit, or around 10-10:30, but the spikes seem to be in the afternoon if I'm looking at it right. I thought it was a super interesting site, although I'd have to admit I wasn't sure exactly what I was looking at on most of it. Thanks for the link.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext