Bill,
Regarding religion, I am confused. You say that I have attacked your beliefs in my resonse. What do you refer to, the fact that I have said I am insulted ?? Or that I do not agree with what you said about Priests and God. What part of the above can be construed as an attack ?
Regarding Westergaard, I asked in a previous post if you had researched comments on both sides of the issue. Assuming you didn't, in Westergaard's own words he states that most of what Pluvia says is correct. With Westergaards own statement in mind, the premise that he is protecting an honest and forthright company in Plsia weakens each time he opens his mouth. If that is true, again I ask you, what is Westergaards motive for hunting down Pluvia??
The only logical explanation is to stifle Puvia and his comments, whether those comments are true or not bears no meaning to Westergaard.
Simply said, Westergaard's tactics are despicable and in my opinion he is the type of person who should be prosecuted for what he has attempted to do. I say attempted because if public opinion on this forum is any indication of whether he was successful, it would seem he has failed miserably. Have you read any comments from shareholders of Plsia on this board ? If I were Plsia, I would get a disclaimer in the press asap.
Tom |
