Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (155697)	1/9/2005 11:19:50 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) of 281500

MQ, PS IF you use your list of the reasons for war as assumptions + add nadines political reshaping of the mideast which is certainly a neocon goal; could you come up with better policy options for the US in the post iraqi election period? I have proposed the declare victory, remove troops to shiaa and kurd areas, help the north and south fight any civil war brought to them by baathists and osama terrorists, and allow the triangle to settle the future, using force. I have suggested that if we can prevent expansion of civil war into a shiaa/sunni struggle, the terrorists and nationalists in the triangle would end up fighting each other, especially because jihadists are mostly foreigners and that without the common US enemy to fight they would fight each other eventually. That all hinges on whether we can contain the civil war within the war between shiaa and sunni, kurd and arab. What do you think? mike

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next