Pluvia vs. Westergaard Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Pluvia vs. Westergaard

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Noneyet who wrote (909)	9/1/1997 6:49:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	of 1267

Thomas; from my view point all items are open to discussion with no untouchable areas. Whatever my views on religion are, you can agree or disagree with them. They are not meant to be personal insults, just points of view towards which or away from which you can lean. Of course if you suggest roasting cats for dinner I might be offended, but not insulted. If I accused you of roasting cats for dinner you are insulted, if you do not roast cats for dinner. But I did not accuse you of any belief, I just stated mine, and at most you can find my position an offensive one and not insulting. By saying I insulted you as a transitive action you attack me. That is all. So Let it be. I have not read all of Westergaard, and I will agree the thread might have a strong case against his position that I cannot know as I lack the depth of reading all the way back(what a chore!!). He seems to have abandoned the thread if his last comments is any indication, and if so I will just let it lie as well. It is hard to say if it just two touters attacking each other, as why does Pluvia feel the need for an anonyme?, what does he hide? Bill

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next