SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread.
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (1862)1/10/2005 11:29:31 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (4) of 5425
 
My one-off comment on Hopsicker was designed to show how Hopsicker and Ruppert, two alleged 9-11 researchers -- embroiled in a lawsuit against each other -- had differing and argumentative views as regards who was responsible, as detailed at signs-of-the-times.org.

For example:

There are a number of things that make us very suspicious of Hopsicker. Firstly, he is promoting, albeit subtly, the Saudi Arabia 9/11 connection, which Senator Bob Graham, Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee's investigation, also exposed when he said:...

If Dobry takes issue with how I summarized their differences and the subject of their lawsuit, and wishes to set the record straight, go for it. Frankly, I'm more interested in what the 9-11 Commission wrote.

- Jeff
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News