Bill,
You certainly can discuss anything you like. I have said explicitly that I disagree with your statements regarding Priests and God, and that they are insulting. I believe any RC would find them the same. How you would like to say I've attacked you for saying I disagree and I'm insulted by what youv'e said is beyond reason.
If any other person reading this would like to reference your post and comments regarding Priests and God, I've copied them below, perhaps you would care to rethink your comments also.
exchange2000.com
>>>>I am no royal toady, and the world would be better of with no royals at all. We should toss that all away with all the god propaganda too. The idea that there is some being in the sky controlling us is as ludicrous as the idea that it has givem a right to rule to some royals. I think religion is just a scheme to allow priests to live a parasitic existence on the rest of us. Royalty; the same thing.<<<<
Now show me where and how I attacked you because I'm insulted by your calling Priests lives parasitic ??? Somehow I have the feeling you Sir, are trying to bait me for some type of planned response you have waiting.
As for Pluvia and Westergaard, the real issue here. You said, " Why does Pluvia feel the need for anonymity. I don't know how long you are a member of SI, but their are many members who probably are employees of many of the companies discussed here and / or professionals whose names should not be made public. Or for whatever other reason they may have that their name's remain anonoymous. I do not disagree with any of the above reasons, and when I read posts from people with alias, their crebility is no less than yours, because of it. Unless, of course I find lies or slanders in those posts.
For your information, I can say that I find most anonymous posters above the average ones on SI and I'm very capable of dissecting their information for it's veracity. I can point you to many, many posts from people with alias, whose critiques on stocks and the market are without parallel. I am thankful they are here, and hope that people like Westergaard et al, are not able to take that away from them.
To conclude, Your question was what does Pluvia hide with his alias, I don't care ! Furthermore, if Pluvia's post's and accusation's regarding Premier are correct, the shareholders in this company should be indebted to him for what he has done.
One other note, Pluvia has also stated that he served on some type of advisory committee in a company he had many doubts in. He said, he was called in because of his incisive posting ( I'm taking this from memory ). Well I would assume that claim is easily traced, as it was a public company. I would also assume he did not get into that committee using his alias. So if you care to, check on that.
Tom |
