SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (214765)1/12/2005 8:49:27 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1574121
 
Sure it has. That's the significant variable.

You saying it doesn't make it so.

Unless you want to believe that our people "in poverty" are much more degenerate and irresponsible than the 44 countries that have lower infant mortality rates. Especially since the more "socialist countries" have much, much lower infant mortality rates.

So which is it, is our system creating a degenerate and irresponsible low middle to lower class, or is our health system neglecting our low middle to lower class?

The stats are clear. What's your answer?


What stats? The only stats that are clear is that infant mortality rates are higher one place than the other. It simply is not determinative of the underlying reason.

You may have had an introductory course in statistics at some point in your life (it isn't evident, if so, but nevertheless). If so, one of the things you would have learned is that correlation doesn't show causality.

Absent some EVIDENCE to suggest that the higher infant mortality rate is CAUSED BY an inferior healthcare system (as opposed to other factors), you simply can't draw the conclusions you're trying to draw.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext