CONSPIRACY THEORIES Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : CONSPIRACY THEORIES

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: sea_urchin who wrote (3)	1/13/2005 3:33:02 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (1) of 418

Re: here's a pic from my last post there to Gus which clearly shows that, seismographically, it's not possible to confuse an earthquake with a nuclear explosion. Wrong: it's possible to confuse them seismographically speaking... and that's why NBT people use hydroacoustic stations --in addition to seismographic ones-- to discriminate between genuine earthquakes and nuclear explosions. Earthquakes are basically soundless --very low frequencies, infrasounds-- whereas nuclear blasts leave a footprint in the acoustic spectre. Besides, I've noticed that the hydroacoustic station closest to the Sumatra quake/nuclear blast was... Diego Garcia!! LOL A US-operated station on a British islet!!! Now, hydroacoustic waves can travel thousands of miles underwater without significant loss (in amplitude) so that Chinese, European,... stations should have picked up any hydroacoustic pike on Dec 26. However, as the document I showed you stated, hydroacoustic data are CONFIDENTIAL/CLASSIFIED data and are the exclusive property of the NBT signatories. In short, just because hydroacoustic stations pick up a nuclear blast doesn't mean that such information will be disclosed "live" to CNN.... Gus

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next