SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (156133)1/13/2005 4:16:29 AM
From: marcos  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
It was all one country, why shouldn't people move from one part to another, people have always done that for a number of reasons, and to hell with the arbitrary lines drawn by the various conquerors ... ask the next obviously indigenous spanish speaker you run into, what significance he finds in the way they change around the placement of coloured bits on maps, he may say ¡todavía es México! just for fun, but what he means is this is the continent of his forefathers, and he has a right

Damn right arabs had shorter distance to travel, this would be because they were not coming from across the sea, from another continent like the zionists, but from a valley or two over, if indeed they had to travel at all, and hadn't simply been born there

'that increase has been as much Arab as Jewish' - no it has not, the proportion of jews in the population has risen enormously, from ten per cent or less in the 1880-1920 period, to over fifty per cent now [using rough figures from memory, for all Palestine from Jordan to the sea] ... this sort of trend is bound to raise concerns among a primitive people in chains to a whacko religion, even if the invaders weren't bulldozing their homes and olive trees, which they happen to be doing in this case

It was not an empty land, but there was room for new people to move and develop the place, sure, no one disputes that .... the zionists brought hard currencies, sharper technology, and more organised ways of going about things, all very well and good .... the problem is, at the centre of their whole ideology was a change that threatened the indigenous, this declaration of the place as a Judenstaat, under which the people of their whacko religion would have rights exceeding those of the people of the other whacko religion

Well, you should be able to see how that could change the dynamic .... the whole idea is deadly to human progress, it's tribalistic racist witch-doctor nonsense that didn't belong in the nineteenth century much less the twentieth or the present one .... you just don't base working nations on this kind of narrow hostile stuff, you need a Menschenstaat not a Whackenstaat.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext