J.C.
re: <<Another child might ask you, if we evolved from ape-like creatures (just the last 1/16th inch on the yardstick) then how come there still are ape-like creatures around? Why did some of the apes evolve all the way until they became humans, while other apes stayed just as they are? Do you have a good answer for that child?>>
Evolution has to be thought of as "Trees, Not ladders" . A common misconception..
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"""Understanding Phylogenies
Phylogenetic starbursts
Trees, Not Ladders
Several times in the past, biologists have committed themselves to the erroneous idea that life can be organized on a ladder of lower to higher organisms. This idea lies at the heart of Aristotle’s Great Chain of Being (see right).
Similarly, it’s easy to misinterpret phylogenies as implying that some organisms are more “advanced” than others; however, phylogenies don’t imply this at all.
In this highly simplified phylogeny, a speciation event occurred resulting in two lineages. One led to the mosses of today; the other led to the fern, pine, and rose. Since that speciation event, both lineages have had an equal amount of time to evolve. So, although mosses branch off early on the tree of life and share many features with the ancestor of all land plants, living moss species are not ancestral to other land plants. Nor are they more primitive. Mosses are the cousins of other land plants.
So when reading a phylogeny, it is important to keep three things in mind:
Evolution produces a pattern of relationships A B C D among lineages that is tree-like, not ladder-like.
Just because we tend to read phylogenies from left to right, there is no correlation with level of “ advancement.”
For any speciation event on a phylogeny, the choice of which lineage goes to the right and which goes to the left is arbitrary. The following phylogenies are equivalent:
Biologists often put the clade they are most interested in (whether that is bats, bedbugs, or bacteria) on the right side of the phylogeny.
Misconceptions about humans
The points described above cause the most problems when it comes to human evolution. The phylogeny of living species most closely related to us looks like this:
It is important to remember that:
Humans did not evolve from chimpanzees. Humans and chimpanzees are evolutionary cousins and share a recent common ancestor that was neither chimpanzee nor human.
Humans are not “higher” or “more evolved” than other living lineages. Since our lineages split, humans and chimpanzees have each evolved traits unique to our own lineages. """"
evolution.berkeley.edu
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The Above from "An Evolution Website for Teachers" Very nice site with good diagrams. Keep clicking on 'Next Topic'..The 'Misconception' subject matter is quite interesting.
evolution.berkeley.edu
c |
