SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Pluvia vs. Westergaard

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Pluvia who wrote (916)9/2/1997 3:57:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell   of 1267
 
Here's the type of stuff the SEC really likes to discuss. Does any of this sound familiar?

- Jeff

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.

LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 15264 / February 25, 1997

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. GEORGE CHELEKIS, KGC, INC.,
AND HOT STOCKS REVIEW, INC., Civil Action No. 97CV-00374 (D.D.C.)
(filed February 25, 1997)

On February 25, 1997, the Commission filed a complaint in
the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
against George Chelekis ("Chelekis"), KGC, Inc. and Hot Stocks
Review, Inc. The complaint alleges that from at least January
1995 through August 1995, Chelekis, a publisher who distributes
various investment newsletters, known as the "Hot Stocks"
publications, over the Internet and in print format, knowingly or
recklessly made materially false and misleading statements
concerning six publicly-traded companies. The complaint further
alleges that from April 1994 through September 1995, Chelekis
failed to disclose in the Hot Stocks publications that he and
entities that he controls, defendants KGC, Inc. and Hot Stocks
Review, Inc., received at least $1.1 million from more than 150
issuers, and 275,500 shares of stock from 10 issuers, as payment
for recommending securities of such issuers in the Hot Stocks
publications.

Without admitting or denying the allegations in the
complaint, Chelekis, KGC, Inc. and Hot Stocks Review, Inc.
consented to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining
them from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Section 17(b) of the
Securities Act of 1933. The final judgment orders the defendants
to pay a total of $162,727, representing $75,050 in disgorgement,
$12,627 in prejudgment interest and a $75,050 civil penalty. 
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext