SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (156231)1/14/2005 1:17:25 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (3) of 281500
 
The sovereignty issue is not very well thought through. A claim to ownership is not, by itself, more than hot air, without a means of validation and enforcement. The Sioux could claim the Dakotas, but why would anyone let them hold in thrall lands beyond their ability to either use or defend, when there were those prepared to put it to productive use? If a group cannot administer territory, at least with the help of allies, its claim is automatically disputable, and may therefore be settled through force of arms, unless greater powers impose a solution. Israel is vindicated, in the end, because, at the crucial moment, the Arab Powers sought to crush it, and it prevailed.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext