SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: marcos who wrote (156240)1/14/2005 1:47:18 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
No, actually I am not. I am stipulating that there are circumstances where there exists no viable government, either in itself or supported within a defensive framework, to make a reasonable assertion of sovereignty, and that it is natural that an unreasonable claim to sovereignty should be challenged. I am further asserting that when one rejects international law, as did the Arabs in rejecting the Mandate, and put the matter to a test of arms, a decisive loss means something in regard to future claims. In other words, I am stipulating that a claim of sovereignty must be more than hot air.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News