SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: fresc who wrote (137)1/14/2005 9:16:25 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 42652
 
As the 2 systems stand currently, Canadian system is still far cheaper than the American system on a day to day basis.

Not surprising when you consider the American subsidy for Canadian drugs, plus the waiting lists, and other factors.

You think having 40- 50 million people with out health insurance is freedom?

Yes.

Forcing people to pay for other people's medical care reduces freedom. It can be argued that its worth it, that the overall net benefit to society is worth the loss of freedom but the loss should be reconized whether or not it is considered worth it.

Mothers having baby's and going back to work in 3 weeks, that's freedom?

If someone compells them to go back by force then no, but that isn't the case. Compelling someone (even an insurance company) to pay for their care and then to pay benefits or wages so they don't have to go back to work soon is a reduction in freedom. Again you can argue that its worth it but it is a reduction in freedom.

What freedoms do you think Canadians are loosing out on?

Your GUNS?


That is one example. Also paying higher taxes and having the government control a larger percentage of the economy.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext