Re: One has nothing to lose just to ask them if they have any hydroacoustic data from 12-26? And if not, why not?
There's no hurry. If, as I claim, the tsunami did result from the simultaneous underwater blast of, say, 5 or 6 1-megaton nukes off Sumatra then the hydroacoustic signature of that event must be kept somewhere... I suspect India --a mature nuclear power-- maintains her own hydroacoustic station(s) in the Indian Ocean. But then, what would be the point for India to tell the world that her hydroacoustic measures point to a nuclear explosion as the likely cause of the Dec 26 tsunami? We would still be faced with the question of "WHO detonated the nukes?" Of course, it's easy for me to pin it on the US (see the next point below) but for the Prime Minister of India to accuse the US.... quite a whole another ballgame, huh?
Actually, the snippet below will be the litmus test of my theory:
Re: His intervention also appeared to advance the next project of Pentagon hawks: regime change in Tehran.
Message 20952136
Indeed, the US terror diplomacy --the Sumatra tsunami being the latest avatar thereof-- makes sense only as part of the US endeavour to wage war against Iran. Hence time will prove me right... or wrong. If, as I expect, the drums of war on Iran beat louder and louder in the coming weeks/months then I was right: the (nuclear) tsunami was indeed a "warning shot" by the US to those countries that might disrupt the US holy crusade against Iran. In short, US-Israeli escalation against Iran is the linchpin, the ultima ratio of my tsunami theory.
Gus |
