Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (95297)	1/15/2005 5:44:27 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) of 793801

LOL! Even when affirmative evidence is given that credibly establishes you are wrong; you manage (still with zero evidence) to spin the damning evidence against you into a negative against Bush. The "evil" Bush repeatedly made heartfelt, inclusive remarks about non-religious folks to make up for alleged nonverbal dismissiveness in the past. He certainly had no right to non-verbally have you playing second fiddle to those "ragheads"! Bush is such a bigot, unlike you, eh? I'll give you credit though. You were clever enough to also absolve all liberal Presidents (again with zero evidence) who have no established history of making similar heartfelt statements that were inclusive of the non-religious, yet they received none of your ire. No doubt you'll continue to assure us that you aren't liberally biased. Unfortunately, some of us will find this incredulous since do you have a consistent history of smearing conservatives in the face of clearly conflicting evidence (&/or with no credible evidence). And yes, you also have a history of defending liberals in the face of clearly conflicting evidence with some very contorted confabulations. No doubt it has a lot to do with your version of nuance (and reality).

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next