"That's not scientific. It's fine to teach it in comparative religion, but it's not science."
There is a great deal more evidence for the 'theory' that God did it, than there is for the 'theory' that 'absent a God, evolution acted completely on its own with no more profound purpose other than to 'evolve'. Both are theories, one of them wholistically accounts for all that is and encompasses the other.
Your insistence that the 'theory of evolution' accounts for the beginnings of the universe is factually flawed, and based purely on 'belief' that it must be so because you lack faith in anything else. However, your presumptions are PURE faith based creation theory, madam lab cloak cleric...
" Evolution - correct or incorrect- or any other theory that is scientific, is merely an explanation for facts, and which is driven by facts, and which is supported by the facts(one hopes), and which can be thrown out, and which is not religious.
Balderdash: The theory falls apart under its own scientific analysis. What was before the first instance, or event, or entity of matter? What caused that? What was before the most extent before? Unless you ascribe to an eternal universe and then you have to start admitting some things are limitless ... so then why are you arguing about 'creation'. |
