Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (156313)	1/18/2005 8:36:34 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) of 281500

It is rather frustrating. First, the indigenous model is not applicable, the territories belonged to successive states, and were at last administered by the British on behalf of the League of Nations/UN. Second, even if the indigenous model applied, it is only to acknowledge a vacuum, which was filled by the UN, until the Arabs decided to reject their solution and resort to arms. Either way, Arab rejectionism created the refugee problem, and the continued hostility made return impossible. One of the problems with informal claims is exemplified in the compensation mess. Few records exist to vindicate claims to property. It is not primarily a matter of the ravages of war, it is mostly a failure to systematically file records in the first place. The fact that Arabic is spoken from the borders of Iraq to West Africa indicates not the expansion of the Indigenous, but the imposition of the Imperial, and Arabic nationalism is predicated on a return to the glory of the Caliphate. The Palestinian Question has to do with the reassertion of Arab Imperialism in the territories of North Africa and the Middle East.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next